Inform Clinical Challenges in Colorectal Cancer
Predict overall survival
97%
of ctDNA negative patients vs. 71.8% of ctDNA positive patients had 36-month OS.2
ctDNA clearance and survival
100%
ctDNA-positive patients who achieved sustained clearance had 100% OS at 24 months.2
Powering personalized decisions in early and late stage CRC
Signatera™-positivity was predictive of inferior OS
Signatera™ MRD status predicted overall survival: Patients who tested Signatera™-positive after surgery had significantly worse overall survival (OS) compared to those who were Signatera™-negative.²
Predict which CRC patients may benefit from treatment escalation
CALGB (Alliance)/SWOG 80702 publication JAMA Oncology, evaluating the predictive and prognostic value of Signatera™ in 940 stage III colon cancer treated with adjuvant FOLFOX ± celecoxib:
- Signatera™-positive patients treated with both chemotherapy and celecoxib showed a 40% improvement in overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone.³
- No benefit from celecoxib was observed in Signatera™-negative patients.
- Celecoxib improved DFS in Signatera™-positive patients, independent of PIK3CA mutational status
Natera Cancer Care can help support this therapy recommendation
- Altera™ tumor genomic profiling for patient selection + Signatera™ MRD testing.
- Altera™ detects PI3K pathway mutations (PIK3CA, PTEN, PIK3R1), which guide NSAID therapy decisions.
- With a single sample, you can get molecular residual disease (MRD) and tumor genomic profiling from the same tumor sample, enabling you to select the right patients for additional therapy and track their MRD status over time.
Signatera™-positive status predicted MDT better than CEA, especially in stage II–III CRC patients
Signatera™ identified more patients eligible for curative-intent MDT during surveillance by detecting recurrence at the molecular level, when patients are still candidates for local therapy.⁴
Clinical applications for Signateraᵀᴹ in CRC
Neoadjuvant response monitoring
Monitor neoadjuvant response with serial Signatera™ testing.
Identify low risk patients who are ctDNA-negative to potentially support a nonsurgical “watch and wait” approach.
Post-surgical MRD assessment
Identify patients at high risk of recurrence who may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.
Recurrence monitoring
Assess for MRD more accurately than current risk assessment methods:
- ctDNA-positivity in the surveillance window was predictive of inferior DFS
- Compared to patients who were serially ctDNA negative, patients with ctDNA positivity at any timepoint were approximately 34 times more likely to recur (HR: 33.56, 95%CI: 26.07–43.20, P < 0.0001;
Clinical application: What’s the value of serial testing in the surveillance setting?
Keith, CRC patient
Enabling time to process and make informed plans
Giving you Latitudeᵀᴹ with MRD testing
Latitude™ is a tissue-free, blood-based, residual disease test (MRD) that delivers fast and reliable results without the need for tumor tissue. Latitude™ is built using a targeted panel, composed of differentially methylated regions specifically for colorectal cancer (CRC). Latitude™ offers strong performance, with high sensitivity and specificity for detecting residual disease in CRC patients.7
Medically actionable information to guide treatment decisions, from diagnosis through survivorship
Covered by Medicare for multiple solid tumor indications
Is Signatera™ for gastrointestinal cancer right for your patients?
References
1Reinert T, et al. Analysis of plasma cell-free DNA by ultradeep sequencing in patients with stages I to III colorectal cancer. JAMA Oncology. 2019;5(8):1124–113. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0528.
2Kotani D, et al. Molecular residual disease and efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer. Nature Medicine. 2023;29(1).
3Nakamura Y, Watanabe J, Akazawa N, et al. ctDNA-based molecular residual disease and survival in resectable colorectal cancer. Nature Medicine. 2024.
4Bratman SV, et al. Personalized circulating tumor DNA analysis as a predictive biomarker in solid tumor patients treated with pembrolizumab. Nature Cancer. 2020;1(9):873–881. DOI: 10.1038/s43018-020-0096-5.
5Nowak JA, et al. Prognostic and predictive role of ctDNA in stage III colon cancer treated with celecoxib: Findings from CALGB/SWOG 80702. Presented at ASCO GI, 2025.
6Dasari A, et al. Clinical utility of including circulating tumor DNA monitoring in standard of care colorectal cancer surveillance. Presented at ESMO Gastrointestinal Cancer Annual Meeting, 2025.
7Nakamura Y, et al. Clinical validation of a tissue-free colorectal cancer test for the detection of molecular residual disease by circulating tumor DNA. Poster presented at ESMO GI, Barcelona, Spain. July 2025. Poster 93P.
8Zaanan A, Didelot A, Broudin C, et al. Longitudinal ctDNA analysis during treatment of resectable gastric and GEJ cancer: the PLAGAST study. Nature Communications. 2025;16:6815.
9Botta M, et al. Tumor-informed ctDNA predicts recurrence and survival in resected pancreatic cancer. The Oncologist. 2024. DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae155.
10Abdelrahim M, et al. The feasibility of personalized and tumor-informed ctDNA assay for early recurrence detection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. JCO Precision Oncology, 2025.
11Abdelrahim M, et al. Real-world ctDNA analysis in resected Stage I–III biliary tract cancer. Poster #420. Presented at ASCO, 2025.