SMFM’s 43 Annual Pregnancy Meeting
February 6 – 11, 2023
San Francisco, CA
Join us at Booth #515
Real world insights from the use of NIPT in management of twin pregnancies
Wednesday, February 8 | 12:00 pm–1:00 pm PT
Room 2001, Moscone West, Level 2
This MFM panel will focus on clinical experience of using SNP-based NIPT in twin pregnancies; examine how detection of zygosity and fetal fraction impacts management; and discuss case examples of how NIPT influenced the management of twin pregnancies.
This independent presentation is not part of the official program as planned by the SMFM Pregnancy Meeting™ Program Committee. The content of this session is not endorsed by or recommended by SMFM.
-
Lihong Mo, MD, PhDMaternal Fetal Medicine Fellow
University of California Davis Medical Center -
Maeve K. Hopkins, MD, MADivision of Maternal Fetal Medicine
Assistant Professor Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine and Case Western Reserve University
-
Ruben Quintero, MDThe Fetal Institute, Miami
-
Russ Jelsema, MDSr. Medical Director,
Reproductive Health, Natera
Natera has realistic simulation models for training amniocentesis and transcervical CVS, which Natera provides free of charge for use by MFM fellowships or by attendings who need a "refresher course". The models have been used at 44 fellowships, as well as at the annual GOHO MFM fellows ultrasound training course. You can see and try the models at the Natera booth.
Friday, February 10 | Oral Concurrent Session 5
Genetics/Ultrasound | 3:00 pm - 3:15 pm PT
Room 3022, Moscone West, Level 3
High fetal fraction on cell-free fetal DNA screening: is it associated with adverse perinatal outcomes?
Sina Haeri1, Mary Norton2, Bo Jacobsson3, Cora MacPherson4, Melissa Egbert5, Zachary Demko5, Vivienne Souter5, Pe’er Dar6
Maternal sex chromosome aneuploidy identified through noninvasive prenatal screening: clinical profile and patient experience
Aaron Roberts, Melissa Maisenbacher, Sheetal Parmar, Julia Wilkinson, Sarah Poll, Nicole Faulkner, Siddharth Prakash
Concordance rates of SNP-NIPT and SNP-array products of conception analysis from a single laboratory
Melissa K. Maisenbacher, Katrina Merrion, Wendy DiNonno, Amanda Shrewsbury, Samantha Leonard, Russ Jelsema, Wenbo Xu, Katherine Howard
NIPT redraw success rates after a single no-call result: Experience with updated SNP algorithm
Manesha Putra, Katie Plunkett, Yuhang Liu, Felipe Acosta, Lauren Grimes, Wenbo Xu, Russ Jelsema, Melissa Maisenbacher
References
1Ouma Heath, Park City, Utah
2 University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
4The George Washington University, Washington, DC
5Natera, Inc. Austin, TX
6Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY